It requires Member States to mutual recognise their national regulations in cases where there are no generally binding EU regulations. This means that goods produced and marketed in one Member State may be sold without further restrictions in all other Member States.
Since , the Cassis de Dijon principle has enabled many products from the EU that used to have to be specially produced, repacked or relabelled for the Swiss market to be imported more easily and without technical barriers. This is subject to the condition that the products comply with the regulations of the EU country of origin.
The Swiss Parliament has introduced a special regulation for food products. The "Cassis de Dijon principle" derived from this ruling generally states that all products that have been manufactured in accordance with the regulations in force in one EU member state may be sold in all other member states, irrespective of the different regulations that may apply to such a product there.
Accordingly, a Member State may restrict the free movement of goods within the EU only for very specific reasons in the public interest fiscal control, protection of public health and fair trading, and consumer protection. REWE's action was upheld in the judgement on the grounds that the ban was "incompatible with the European free movement of goods". This judgement subsequently had a precedent-setting effect. See also under Wine Law. You are using an old browser that may not function as expected.
Homepage Main navigation Content area Sitemap Search. Context sidebar. Social share. The legal acts aim to set the general rules for the safety of other products not related to the product group of the decision. For what we can see, the Cassis de Dijon produced many memes and even forty years after those memes keep pushing the European Common Market forward.
What is the perspective of several countries on punitive damages in and outside of Europe? Skip to main content. Lawblogger More articles from Lawblogger. Other blogs:.
0コメント